Category Archives: Newburyport Current

Whose Fault is that 292-Foot Wind Turbine??

A 292-foot wind turbine, that only a visually-impaired environmentalist could love, looms large over Route One in Newburyport.

A 292-foot wind turbine, that only a visually-impaired environmentalist could love, looms large over Route One in Newburyport.

That 292-foot high wind turbine is quite a sight, isn’t it? Try NOT looking at it when you ride along Route One in Newburyport.

The Current hit the target when they referred to it as, “A 292-foot mistake,” on their February 27th editorial page.

But whose mistake was it?  The editorial leaves the impression that Mark Richey and his “experts” tricked the city council.  We’re to believe that these experts, employed by the wind turbine proponents, minimized the negatives and our city council didn’t catch on.  Are our councilors that naiveté? I don’t think so.

In my opinion, Newburyport is a community in which the care of the environment is very important.  When someone comes along with an idea that seems to head in that direction the resistance loses ground.

Mark Richey’s wind turbine was just such an idea.  The advocates touted its environmental positives and discovered that in this town they were preaching to the choir.  The disorganized opponents were dismissed as over-reacting and not able to see the big picture.

Well, now the wind turbine is in place.  One look tells you that it is a monstrosity and the happy environmentalist chatter will not change that.  Instead of admitting their complicity in the decision to allow the tower, the city council cowardly attempts to slide the blame elsewhere.

I suspect that many of the most ardent, “environment first – people second” advocates, do not have the wind turbine in their sight lines.  They assume that those that do will get used to it for the greater good of the community. 

When Senator Ted Kennedy was alerted to the fact that speck-sized wind turbines would be built off Hyannis, the champion of alternative and renewable energy lost the fire in his belly and made sure they weren’t built.  What is a hypocrite?

I believe that the “environment first – people second” crowd in Newburyport have given us a wonderful example of what their views look like in real life.  When they start trying to “walk their talk”, in the future, it is time to remember their 292-foot mistake.

(Prepared as a letter to the editor for the Newburyport Current on February 27th.)

Leave a comment

Filed under 292-foot wind tower, Newburyport, Newburyport Current

Don’t Extend the School Day at Nock Middle School

Why in the world would they want to extend the school day at Nock Middle School?

Alyson Aiello writes in second paragraph of “Nock looks at longer days” in the Newburyport Current (November 21st), “The idea (extra hour of school) came about based on last spring’s MCAS results, which fell short of expectations.” 

Don’t you wonder how schools with results that don’t fall short of expectations, manage to get good scores in just a normal school day?  Wouldn’t a visit to those successful, nearby middle schools make more sense than a trip to the Expanded Learning Time summit on December 5th?  Probably cost a lot less as well.

Administrators can be part of the underachieving problem. 

Some administrators make it difficult for teachers to teach.  If you think that teachers have 180 days of full class periods to teach, you’re dreaming.  Distractions may abound such as disruptive students, uncomfortable classrooms, assemblies, workshops, etc…  I suspect that the fewer the distractions the better the learning possibilities will be. 

Teachers can be part of the underachieving problem.

A few years ago in Chattanooga (TN), the teachers in the underachieving schools were required to reapply for their jobs.  Many teachers weren’t rehired. That’s because if there’s one thing that the state tests do it is to point out the underachieving teachers and departments.  I wonder if all of the Nock Middle School teachers would be rehired if they had to reapply?

Students can be part of the underachieving problem.

Lack of incentive could well be an issue.  What’s in it for a middle school student taking the MCAS?  A high schooler needs to pass to graduate.  Not so with a middle schooler. 

Also in the mix is the fact that some students learn slowly.  It often isn’t for lack of effort, just lack of ability.  However, their scores count and affect a school system’s score.

When a school’s test results fall short of expectations, does it make any sense to have extended learning time for the teachers and students who are NOT falling short?  Of course not, unless it is voluntary, which this doesn’t appear to be. 

On the other hand, why not make the extra hour mandatory for those who underachieved? 

The students would get extra help in the subject areas they need help in and be taught by teachers the administration thinks will do the best job at it.  The selected teachers would be compensated for the extra time.

The underachieving teachers would now have an extra hour to prepare and to attend teaching/subject area workshops.  Should a school system allow an underachieving teacher to be involved in extracurricular activities such as sports?

Expand the learning time only for the students and teachers who, according to the MCAS, need it.  I think it would pay off.

(Sent as a letter-to-the-editor to the Newburyport Current on November 21st)

Leave a comment

Filed under Newburyport, Newburyport Current

Underwhelmed by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama

Hillary ClintonAre these two the best that the Democrats have?

Burger King should switch their headquarters from Fountainbleau (FL) to Chappaqua (NY).  After all, with Hillary Clinton in residence they truly are, “The Home of the Whopper.”

Hillary ClintonHillary has always had trouble telling the truth but in the past could count on many in the media to defend or ignore her actions.  Since Barack Obama has become the media darling the former first lady finds herself closely scrutinized after every utterance.

Therefore, she no longer gets a pass when she claims that she has experience in dealing with crises overseas – think Irish peace talks and Bosnian sniper.  Predictably, when the media does its homework and checks into her version of events they find irrefutable facts to disprove her stories.   Confronted with lies she answers with excuses.

Then there is Barack Obama. He went from prospect to suspect with his speech on March 18th.  You and I know that by not announcing that he was separating himself from Jeremiah Wright’s church he gave approval to what went on there. 

Barrack ObamaThe politically astute thing for Obama to do was to toss Reverend Wright and his church under the bus instead of his white grandmother.  Were his supporters then likely to switch over to Hillary or John McCain?  No chance!

Barack stayed with Trinity United Church of Christ even though it’s not politically advantageous because he doesn’t find Reverend Wright’s anti-American rhetoric as offensive as the rest of us do. 

Certainly, Reverend Wright’s rhetoric is indefensible and he should know better because he’s acquainted with the Bible.  Yes, there are places in the Bible where Jesus was angry at what he saw going on around him.  Reverend Wright seems to have this anger side covered but there are also places where Jesus insisted on the need to forgive others.  Somewhere during the 20+ years of listening to Reverend Wright, Barack should have clearly noted the imbalanced tone of Wright’s messages and moved elsewhere. 

There is an obvious shortage of bumper stickers for Obama or Hillary in Newburyport.  I guess that even the most ardent Democrat is in a quandary defending either of them.

George Bush leaves office on January 20, 2009.  Heaven help us if either Hillary or Barack is anywhere near the premises when it happens.

(Appeared in The Newburyport Daily News on April 2nd and Newburyport Current on April 4th)

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Newburyport, Newburyport Current, Newburyport Daily News, President George Bush

I Voted for Barack Obama

Barrack Obama

I am writing to congratulate myself for voting for Barack Obama and being part of his 28-vote victory in Newburyport in the Democrat primary.

My vote was not based on Mr. Obama’s skin color because I’m not a racist.  I do admit,however, that I do not watch BET (Black Entertainment Television) or support the United Negro College Fund because they’re racist.

My vote was not based on Barack’s middle name, “Hussein.” That middle name is part of his Moslem background.  If I let his background factor into my vote, I would be a racist and I’m not.  However, if I learned that his hand was going to be on the Koran instead of the Bible when he was sworn in to the presidency I would vote against him.  That’s not being racist. That is believing that the Bible, not the Koran, contains the truths that I want my leader to pledge allegiance to.

My vote was not based on Barack being against the war in Iraq.  Barack was in the State Senate, not the US Senate, when the vote for that war took place.  If he had been confronted with the same evidence that President Bush and Hillary Clinton were confronted with he would have voted to go ahead with the war. 

My vote was not based on Barack’s belief that abortion should be available in all nine months of pregnancy.  I am opposed to abortion and consider the slaughter of unborn children to be a horrific tragedy.

My vote is not based on Barack’s willingness to put an end to some of the tax cuts that have been enacted during the current administration.  I defy anyone to explain to me how sending me out into the buying world with less money is going to help the economy. 

My vote is not based on Barack’s talk of unifying the country.  I believe that his idea of “unity” is for me to change my previously held positions and switch to his.  I have a right to my opinion even if it disagrees with his opinion.  Labeling opinions that are different from his, “divisive,” is a step toward trying to shut off constructive dialogue. 

My vote is not based on the endorsements of Senator Kerry and Senator Kennedy.  Those two are the punch lines of jokes in any comic setting.  Kerry was offered $1 million to clear up the controversy surrounding his service in the Vietnam War.  He proved that either he didn’t need the money or he couldn’t clear his name by taking no action.  Kennedy looked out his ocean-side window and decided that his view was more important than a wind energy program that would lower electricity rates on the Cape.

So why did I vote for Barack Obama?  Quite simply it was a vote against Hillary Clinton. 

At a dinner party recently, I heard someone say that they were voting for Hillary because, “she was the only one that they could trust.”  You’re right, it stunned me too!  If past performance means anything, Hillary is the one that can’t be trusted.

Let me make a prediction: Barack Obama is going to get the Democrat nomination but during the trip to also-rans, the Clintons are going to tear that party apart.  It gives me pleasure to think that I may have had a hand in that process in a voting booth at the Brown School.

( Appeared in both the Newburyport Current and the Newburyport Daily News on February 15, 2008. )

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Newburyport, Newburyport Current, Newburyport Daily News, President George Bush, Senator John Kerry, Senator Ted Kennedy

Surprising Behavior by Senator John Kerry and Michael Cook

What is this world coming to? 

Is it possible that prolific letter writer Michael Cook wrote an entire entry for last week’s Newburyport Current (“Culture of celebrity is all about marketing”) without including “President Bush” and an unflattering adjective in the same sentence?

Is it also possible that our Senator Kerry called former president Bill Clinton a “liar” last Friday?

It is not only possible but also true in both cases.  I found both occurrences refreshing.

I will admit that I generally only read Michael’s entries until the word “Bush” shows up.  After that, the Far Left talking points start and my interest vanishes.  I’m not crazy about President Bush, especially on immigration, but he is not the cause of all the evil in the world. 

In this article, which I was able to read in its entirety, Michael opined on a topic that my wife and I have discussed more than a few times: “Why do some of the lightweights of our society get paid so much money?”  Like us, Michael wonders why those who really make a difference in society struggle to get by. 

Michael credits this unfairness to the fact that the successful are getting assistance from publicists while the rest of us are not.  We may be doing great things but no one is notifying the media of it or setting up contacts that will lead to financial rewards.  I absolutely agree.

I do think we have to remember that we live in a culture that is willing to pay dearly to be entertained.  Those offering the entertainment know this.  When ticket prices go up people are outraged.  However, they do have two choices – pay or stay home.  Most choose to pay and that just emboldens those offering the entertainment.

Michael thinks that the sordid lifestyles of many of the celebrities will eventually lessen our interest in following them and/or paying to see them perform.  I hope he’s right but after flipping through the TV channels and seeing previews of coming attractions, I think that those providing the entertainment totally disagree with Michael on this point.   The faces and thoughts of fools are constantly before us today and most likely will be there tomorrow. 

When the Super Bowl is over and they start interviewing the participants you can bet that more than a few players will be an embarrassment to watch………but we’ll watch just to see if they embarrass themselves.  Of course, if they’re celebrating Patriots players we’ll bear with it and the networks know that.

John Kerry 

The other pleasant surprise I referred to was Kerry calling Clinton a liar.   It wasn’t breaking news that the Clintons are often free and easy with the truth it was just that Senator Kerry showed some moxie and went after the Clintons.   Kerry’s endorsement of Obama early this month didn’t cause much of a stir. I, in fact, thought that Kerry’s endorsement might do Obama more harm than good since Senator Kerry is about as popular as those dogs that leave their calling cards down on the Merrimac River boardwalk are. 

It aggravated many Obama supporters that because Kerry delayed his endorsement he fumbled a chance to help Obama in the neighboring New Hampshire primary.  A number of national media types, much to his embarrassment, noted Kerry’s poor timing. 

The media criticism stirred Senator Kerry into action.  He made sure that he wasn’t late in having an impact in Massachusetts on Super Tuesday (February 5th).  This time around he not only told the truth about the former President but also reinforced his support for Senator Obama.  Hillary currently has a 30+ point lead in the polls in Massachusetts.  However, with Governor Patrick, along with Kerry and now Senator Kennedy backing Obama it could get a lot closer come primary day. 

So, thank you Michael Cook and John Kerry for pleasantly surprising me.

(Submitted to the Newburyport Current on January 29th as a letter to the editor. )
 

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Governor Deval Patrick, Newburyport, Newburyport Current, President George Bush, Senator John Kerry, Senator Ted Kennedy

Extend the school day? Only if………………..

When an editorial starts with, “It should be obvious…” you would expect that the conclusion drawn thereafter would be exactly that.  Not in the case of The Newburyport Current editorial ( “More time, better scores” ) put forth on December 6th.

The editor’s contention is that putting students and teachers in classrooms longer will “obviously” produce better results.  Says who?

The editor relies on the statistical findings of an organization called Massachusetts 2020 to prove the point.  Would it help to know that Massachusetts 2020 is heavily committed to the idea of adding days and hours to the school experience?  They’re about as reliable a source regarding extra hours/days in the classroom as Planned Parenthood is on whether abortion is a good idea.

The Massachusetts Department of Education apparently will release their findings regarding extended school time next month.  They could well come to the same conclusion as Massachusetts 2020 but at least they wouldn’t have an agenda going into the research.

The only certainty in extending school time is that it will cost more.  Of course with the Chairman of the US Senate Education Committee (our own Ted Kennedy) leading the way, asking for more money comes easy.  He wants $50 million a year, which will increase to $150 million a year by 2012, to train teachers to help schools redesign academic content for extended time.  What a waste!  Don’t these people ever get tired of throwing our money at problems? 

Those advocating the extended day seem to assume that the teachers and students are performing efficiently during the regular school day we now have.  If we just add time they’ll do even better.  We can’t make that assumption.

I believe that school system leaders know exactly why their schools perform poorly on state tests.  They will not tell you specifically but I will attempt it.

First, some students are not too bright and no matter how long the school’s best teacher spends with them they will not shine on a state test.  A student could well be pleasant, hard working, and a genuine nice kid but it will not matter.  In the real world, the underachiever is called out but not in schools. They hide them by releasing group results. The extended-hours folks think that more time in school will make academically challenged students do better.  Very unlikely.

Second, there are teachers who don’t know how to teach.  If students at a certain grade level do poorly on a section of the state test it is easy for a school system to figure out what teacher was supposed to teach that skill or material.  I’m guessing that a high-quality administrator could sort this out and insist that the teacher improve.  The extended-hours folks think that students will somehow benefit by spending more time with an underachieving teacher.  Very unlikely.

Do you get the sense that schools spend most of their time trying to help underachieving students do better?  That’s because they do.   But what about the rest of the students?

I think that US schools should try to compete with the schools in the rest of the world.  What holds the US back is that in many schools classes are mixed with achievers and underachievers.  The schools’ top students are hurt by this arrangement. 

What would happen if only the best students and teachers were given a longer school day?  You combine the ability to learn with the ability to teach and all kinds of good things could happen.  No need to redesign anything.  Just put your two strongest elements together. 

I am very much in favor of extended school time for the top achieving students and teachers.  Extending school for everyone else will never be worth the effort and money involved.

(Appeared in the Newburyport Current on December 21, 2007)

Leave a comment

Filed under Newburyport Current, Senator Ted Kennedy

Opening Pitch for Override?

I read, “Hopping: $$ woes hurting Nock,” in the November 9, 2007 issue of the Newburyport Current and immediately thought of major league baseball.  I couldn’t help but think that the Rupert Nock principal had been designated to throw out the first pitch on opening day of the push for an override. 

Cry “wolf,” early, loudly, and continuously and surely the Newburyport community will commit your way the next time an override is tried.  I’m not sure that this tactic will gain enough traction to move very far any more.

The news that the school system is having to adjust because of fewer dollars puts them in a position to better understand the realities that those of us on fixed and/or stagnant incomes deal with regularly.  We may be part of Red Sox Nation but we don’t have the seemingly bottomless pockets of Red Sox management.

It certainly would be nice if the tax base could be expanded to lessen the financial burden but I see this community as anti-business.  All you have to do is suggest that businesses need parking areas for employees and potential customers and you’ll learn what a chilly reception is all about.  Further, add that the parking areas are already in place and could be tastefully landscaped and you’ll quickly be talking to yourself.  Some of these folks are so anti-parking and anti-business that I wonder if they would start a drive to ban books from schools if they found out they came from trees.

Speaking of banning, it would help if we could read some good news about our schools.  Last month there was an article in the daily paper in town that included essays composed by four juniors at NHS. They had written about censorship after their required reading of Catcher in the Rye in their English class.  Unfortunately, none of the students presented a legitimate understanding of why anyone would be offended by the book and therefore might take issue with such a profane book being required reading in 2007.  Instead, all of the students presented well-written support for the “anything goes” side of the argument.  Wouldn’t many of us have wanted the students to be persuasively presented with the idea that there are places for restraint, limits, and moderation?  Maybe the essays were not a true representation of overall student opinion but I’m not so sure.  Critical thinking has no chance in one-sided forums.

I am very supportive of athletics but, let’s face it, they’re a school luxury.  If you’re looking for trouble just hint at cutting back there.  Would it then be asking too much if two of the high school fall sports teams (football & girls soccer) stopped generating headlines for poor behavior in this day when there is talk of stadium refurbishing and updated equipment? 

I have high regard for the leadership in our schools and I applaud the efforts of the School Committee’s Revenue Task Force.  Creativity and accentuating the positives are going to be essential in order to get the educational job done.  Crying, “wolf,” is old school.  Many of us are managing to get by on limited means.  Show us that you can do the same thing.
 

Leave a comment

Filed under Newburyport, Newburyport Current